Talent Acquisition

In the high-stakes world of tech recruiting, getting a “yes” from a top-tier candidate is only half the battle. The real test often begins when the conversation turns to compensation. Negotiating with elite tech talent isn’t like any other salary discussion. These candidates are in perpetual demand, they know their worth, and they expect a compensation package that reflects their expertise.
For recruiters and hiring managers, this moment is fraught with tension. Go in too low, and you risk insulting the candidate and losing them to a competitor. Go in too high without a strategy, and you could strain your budget and set a difficult precedent.
Navigating this conversation successfully requires more than just a budget; it demands preparation, strategy, and a deep understanding of what truly motivates a top performer. Here’s your playbook for mastering the art of the deal.
Phase 1: The Homework – Preparation is Everything
Never walk into a negotiation unprepared. Top candidates can spot an uninformed offer from a mile away. Before you even think about making an offer, you need to do your homework.

Master the Market Data: You need to know the competitive landscape inside and out. Use reliable, up-to-date sources like Levels.fyi, Payscale, and industry-specific reports to benchmark salaries. Don’t just look at base salary; analyze the complete picture—bonuses, equity, and sign-on incentives for similar roles at competitor companies.
Understand “Total Compensation”: For senior tech talent, base salary is often just one piece of the puzzle. Equity (stock options or RSUs) can be a far more significant component of their long-term wealth. Be prepared to explain your company’s equity plan clearly: the number of shares, the strike price, the vesting schedule, and the company’s current valuation.
Define Your Non-Negotiables and Levers: Work with finance and leadership to establish a clear, pre-approved salary band for the role. More importantly, identify your “levers.” If you can’t move much on base salary, what else can you offer? This could be a larger equity grant, a one-time signing bonus, a guaranteed annual bonus, a flexible work arrangement, or a budget for professional development. Knowing your flexibility upfront prevents frantic, last-minute approvals.

Phase 2: The Conversation – Strategy in Action
Once you have your data and your strategy, it’s time to engage. The tone and approach of this conversation can make or break the deal.

Let Them Go First (If Possible): A classic negotiation tactic is to have the other party name their number first. Ask the question professionally: “Based on your experience and the market, what are your salary expectations for this role?” Their answer is a crucial piece of data. If it’s within your band, great. If it’s wildly above, it opens a conversation about how they reached that number and allows you to gently reset expectations with your market data.
Anchor with Confidence: If you have to make the first offer, do so with confidence. Present your offer as a well-researched package that reflects their skills and the market value of the role. Frame it as your “strongest possible offer based on the information you have.” This signals that the number is deliberate, not arbitrary.
Focus on Value, Not Just Budget: Frame the conversation around the candidate’s potential impact on the company. Connect their compensation to the value they will bring. For example: “We see you as a key leader in developing our next-generation platform, and this compensation package reflects that level of responsibility.”
Listen More Than You Talk: After you present the offer, stop talking. Let the candidate process it and respond. Their initial reaction and the questions they ask will tell you everything you need to know about what’s important to them. Are they focused on the base salary? Are they asking deep questions about equity? Are they concerned about benefits? Listen carefully to their priorities.

Phase 3: Handling Objections and Closing the Deal
Top candidates will almost always negotiate. Expect it, and don’t take it personally. This is where your preparation pays off.

The Counteroffer: When a candidate comes back with a counteroffer, don’t give a knee-jerk “no.” Ask them to walk you through their reasoning. Often, they have a competing offer or specific data points. This is your chance to use your levers. You might say, “I can’t get to that base salary, but I can increase the signing bonus to bridge that gap for the first year, and we can offer a performance review in six months.”
The Equity Deep Dive: Be prepared for sophisticated questions about equity. Candidates will want to know about dilution, refresh grants, and potential exit scenarios. Having a finance leader or a senior executive available to join the conversation can add immense credibility.
Beyond the Money: Sometimes, the sticking point isn’t money. A candidate might be negotiating for a better title, a more flexible schedule, or a specific project to lead. If these non-monetary requests are feasible and don’t disrupt team structure, they can be the most cost-effective way to close a deal.

The Golden Rule: Preserve the Relationship
Throughout the entire process, your goal is to make the candidate feel valued and respected, even if you can’t meet every one of their demands. The tech world is small, and your reputation is everything.
Always be transparent about what you can and cannot do. A candidate will respect an honest explanation about salary bands or internal equity far more than a vague or evasive answer. End every conversation on a positive and professional note.
Ultimately, a successful negotiation isn’t about winning or losing. It’s about finding a middle ground where a world-class candidate feels genuinely excited to join your team and the company is confident in its investment. By shifting your mindset from a confrontation to a collaborative partnership, you’ll be far more likely to sign the talent that will shape the future of your business.
Share this post: More

In the cutthroat world of talent acquisition, an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) isn’t just a tool; it’s the central nervous system of your hiring operation. It’s where job requisitions are born, candidates are nurtured, interviews are scheduled, and ultimately, where your next star employee is found. But with a crowded market boasting an array of sophisticated solutions, choosing the right ATS can feel like navigating a minefield. The wrong choice can lead to inefficiencies, frustrated hiring teams, and missed opportunities. The right one, however, can transform your recruitment process into a well-oiled, strategic advantage.
Today, we’re pitting four of the industry’s titans against each other: Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, and Bullhorn. Each has carved out its niche, boasting unique strengths and catering to different organizational needs. From fast-growing startups to established enterprises and bustling staffing agencies, these platforms promise to streamline, optimize, and revolutionize how you hire.
This in-depth article, brought to you by Undercover Recruiter, will dissect each platform, exploring their core functionalities, user experience, integration capabilities, reporting prowess, and pricing models. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to make an informed decision, ensuring your ATS investment delivers maximum ROI and propels your talent acquisition strategy forward.
Let the ultimate ATS showdown begin!
Understanding the Landscape: A Quick Overview of Our Contenders
Before we dive into the nitty-gritty, let’s set the stage with a brief introduction to each player:

Greenhouse: Often lauded as a leader in structured hiring, Greenhouse is synonymous with robust, data-driven recruitment. It’s built for organizations that prioritize process, collaboration, and a consistent candidate experience. With a strong emphasis on analytics and interview kits, Greenhouse aims to remove bias and improve hiring outcomes.
Lever: Positioned as a “Talent Acquisition Suite,” Lever goes beyond traditional ATS functionalities, integrating powerful CRM (Candidate Relationship Management) capabilities. It’s designed for proactive recruitment, talent nurturing, and building strong pipelines, making it a favorite among companies focused on talent pooling and relationship building.
Workable: Known for its user-friendliness and intuitive design, Workable is often the go-to for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and companies seeking an all-in-one, easy-to-implement solution. It simplifies the entire hiring process, from job posting to offer management, without overwhelming users with excessive complexity.
Bullhorn: A long-standing veteran in the recruitment software space, Bullhorn is particularly dominant in the staffing and recruitment agency sector. Its strength lies in its comprehensive CRM features tailored for agency recruiters, robust database management, and extensive automation capabilities designed to manage high-volume placements.

Over the next few sections, we’ll peel back the layers of each platform, comparing them across critical dimensions to help you determine which one truly aligns with your organization’s unique recruitment philosophy and operational demands.
Now, let’s move into the core features and user experience for each platform.
1. Greenhouse: The Champion of Structured Hiring
Core Philosophy: Data-driven decisions, structured processes, and collaborative hiring.
Greenhouse has become a darling of the enterprise and high-growth tech company world, largely due to its unwavering commitment to structured hiring. It’s not just an ATS; it’s a framework designed to standardize the recruitment process, reduce bias, and ensure every hiring decision is backed by solid data.
Key Features & Functionality:

Structured Interview Kits & Scorecards: This is Greenhouse’s bread and butter. For every interview stage and role, hiring managers can build detailed interview kits with specific questions and scorecards for evaluating candidates against predefined competencies. This standardizes feedback, makes it easier to compare candidates objectively, and provides a clear audit trail.
Offer Management: Robust and customizable offer letter generation and e-signature capabilities streamline the final stages of hiring.
Onboarding Workflows: While primarily an ATS, Greenhouse offers basic onboarding capabilities to help new hires transition smoothly, integrating with HRIS systems to push new employee data.
Referral Management: A comprehensive employee referral program module encourages internal staff to refer candidates and tracks their progress and potential bonuses.
Job Board Integrations: Seamless integration with major job boards (free and paid), social media platforms, and career pages.
Candidate Experience (CRM Lite): While not a full-fledged CRM like Lever, Greenhouse offers features to keep candidates engaged, such as automated email sequences, interview self-scheduling, and a personalized candidate portal.
Agency Portal: Provides a dedicated portal for external recruiters to submit candidates and track their progress, ensuring clear communication and reducing administrative overhead.
Customizable Workflows: Tremendous flexibility in designing unique hiring plans for different roles, allowing for tailored stages, approvals, and tasks.

User Interface (UI) & User Experience (UX):
Greenhouse’s UI is professional, clean, and highly functional. It’s designed for efficiency, with clear navigation and a logical flow from requisition creation to candidate management.

For Recruiters: Dashboards provide quick overviews of open requisitions, candidate pipelines, and pending tasks. Candidate profiles are comprehensive, consolidating all communications, feedback, and scheduling in one place.
For Hiring Managers: The experience is streamlined. Managers can easily review candidate applications, access interview kits, submit feedback via scorecards, and participate in offer approvals. The emphasis is on making their involvement as efficient as possible.
Learning Curve: Moderate. While intuitive for daily tasks, unlocking its full potential, especially around custom reporting and complex workflow configurations, requires a bit more training.

Real-World Scenario:
Imagine a fast-growing tech company scaling rapidly. They need to hire dozens of engineers, product managers, and sales executives simultaneously. Without a structured process, inconsistencies in interviewing, feedback, and decision-making could lead to bad hires and wasted time. Greenhouse allows them to create standardized interview loops for each role, ensuring every candidate is evaluated fairly against the same criteria. Hiring managers, often busy with their core responsibilities, appreciate the clear interview kits and easy-to-use scorecard system, minimizing their administrative burden and maximizing the quality of their feedback. The talent acquisition team leverages the robust reporting to identify bottlenecks, measure interviewer effectiveness, and track diversity metrics, continuously refining their strategy.
2. Lever: The Talent Relationship Powerhouse
Core Philosophy: Proactive talent engagement, pipeline building, and seamless candidate relationship management (CRM) fused with ATS functionality.
Lever stands out by blurring the lines between an Applicant Tracking System and a Candidate Relationship Management (CRM) system. It’s built for modern talent teams who understand that the best candidates aren’t always actively looking, and that building relationships before a need arises is key to competitive hiring.
Key Features & Functionality:

ATS + CRM Fusion (LeverTRM): This is Lever’s defining feature. It combines traditional ATS functionalities (job postings, application tracking, interview scheduling) with powerful CRM tools. Recruiters can proactively source candidates, nurture relationships through automated email campaigns, and track interactions even before a candidate applies to a specific role.
Talent Pool Management: Easily create and manage talent pools for future needs, segmenting candidates by skills, roles, or locations. This allows for quick activation of pipelines when new requisitions open.
Rich Candidate Profiles: Lever centralizes all candidate data, including resumes, cover letters, social profiles, email exchanges, notes, and feedback. Its “People” tab offers a holistic view of every talent interaction.
Automated Nurture Campaigns: Design and send personalized email sequences to engage passive candidates, keep silver medalists warm, or announce new opportunities.
Collaborative Hiring: Strong features for team collaboration, including centralized feedback, real-time activity feeds, and shared notes.
Interview Scheduling: Robust scheduling tools, including self-service options for candidates and integrations with popular calendar systems (Google Calendar, Outlook).
Reporting & Analytics: Comprehensive reporting capabilities focus on pipeline health, source effectiveness, time-to-hire, and candidate engagement metrics.
Easy Apply & Referral Program: Streamlined application process for candidates and an integrated referral system for employees.

User Interface (UI) & User Experience (UX):
Lever’s UI is sleek, modern, and highly intuitive. It emphasizes ease of use and a visually appealing experience, making it a joy for recruiters to navigate.

For Recruiters: The “Dashboard” provides an immediate snapshot of open jobs and candidate activity. The “People” and “Jobs” sections are well-organized, allowing for quick access to candidate profiles and pipeline stages. The drag-and-drop functionality for moving candidates through stages is particularly smooth.
For Hiring Managers: Managers can easily review candidates, provide feedback, and collaborate with the recruiting team. The system is designed to minimize friction for busy managers.
Learning Curve: Low to moderate. Its intuitive design means recruiters can become proficient quickly. Mastering the more advanced CRM functionalities and automation sequences might require a bit more exploration.

Real-World Scenario:
Consider a rapidly scaling tech startup that relies heavily on passive candidate sourcing and wants to build a strong employer brand. They often find great candidates who aren’t ready to move immediately but would be perfect for future roles. Lever’s combined ATS/CRM allows its talent team to not only manage active applicants but also proactively engage with these passive candidates. They use Lever to segment talent into pipelines for “future engineers” or “potential sales leaders,” sending targeted content and updates. When a new role opens, they can immediately tap into these nurtured talent pools, significantly reducing time-to-hire and reliance on expensive job board advertising. The ability to track every interaction, from initial outreach to interview feedback, provides a complete candidate journey picture, enhancing personalization and increasing conversion rates.
3. Workable: The Intuitive All-in-One for Growth
Core Philosophy: Simplicity, ease of use, and an “all-in-one” solution that democratizes great hiring practices for businesses of all sizes, particularly SMBs.
Workable has gained significant traction by offering a highly intuitive, user-friendly platform that doesn’t sacrifice essential features. It’s designed to be immediately accessible, allowing companies to post jobs, manage candidates, and collaborate effectively without needing extensive training or a dedicated ATS administrator.
Key Features & Functionality:

One-Click Job Posting: Workable excels at simplifying job distribution. With a single click, users can post jobs to hundreds of free and premium job boards, social media channels, and their own career page.
Visual Pipeline Management: A clear, drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to visualize and manage candidates moving through various stages of the hiring pipeline.
AI-Powered Candidate Sourcing & Matching (AI Recruiter): Workable leverages AI to help surface relevant candidates from its vast database, existing talent pools, and publicly available profiles. It can also suggest suitable candidates based on job descriptions.
Built-in Assessment Tools: Offers a library of customizable skills tests and interview questions, helping recruiters evaluate candidates more efficiently.
Collaborative Hiring Tools: Strong features for team feedback, internal notes, and interview scheduling, ensuring all stakeholders are on the same page.
Branded Career Pages: Easily create and customize professional career pages to showcase employer brand and attract top talent.
Offer Management: Streamlined offer letter creation and e-signature functionality.
Reporting & Analytics: Provides essential reporting on key metrics like time-to-hire, source effectiveness, and pipeline status in an easy-to-digest format.
Applicant Tracking & Communication: Centralized communication hub for all candidate interactions, including emails, calls, and scheduling.

User Interface (UI) & User Experience (UX):
Workable’s UI is arguably one of the cleanest and most visually appealing in the market. It prioritizes clarity and simplicity, reducing clutter and making every action feel intuitive.

For Recruiters: The main dashboard provides a clear overview of open jobs and candidates. Managing candidates within a job is straightforward, with a visual pipeline. Everything from scheduling to sending emails feels natural and well-integrated.
For Hiring Managers: Workable is often praised by hiring managers for its simplicity. They can quickly review resumes, provide feedback, and see where candidates stand without getting lost in complex menus.
Learning Curve: Very low. Workable is designed for quick adoption, meaning teams can be up and running with minimal training, which is a huge advantage for smaller teams or those new to dedicated ATS systems.

Real-World Scenario:
Consider a growing marketing agency that has historically relied on spreadsheets and email for hiring. As they expand from 20 to 50 employees, their manual process becomes unsustainable, leading to missed candidates and inefficient communication. They need a system that’s easy to implement, doesn’t require a dedicated IT team, and can get their managers involved without overwhelming them. Workable is an ideal fit. Its “one-click” job posting feature quickly gets their roles out to a wide audience. The visual pipeline makes it easy for the HR manager to track all applicants, and hiring managers can jump in, review applications, and provide feedback directly in the system without extensive training. The built-in assessment tools help them screen candidates more effectively, and the basic reporting gives them immediate insights into their hiring performance.
4. Bullhorn: The Staffing Industry Powerhouse
Core Philosophy: Comprehensive front and back-office management for staffing and recruitment agencies, focusing on high-volume placements, client relationship management, and operational efficiency.
Bullhorn is a colossus in the staffing and recruitment agency world. While it can be adapted for corporate talent acquisition, its DNA is firmly rooted in supporting the unique, fast-paced, and relationship-driven demands of agency recruiters. It’s an all-encompassing platform designed to manage not just candidates, but also clients, contacts, jobs, and placements – often integrating financial and operational aspects.
Key Features & Functionality:

Robust CRM for Clients & Candidates: Bullhorn’s strength lies in its deep CRM capabilities, managing relationships with both clients (for job orders) and candidates (for placements). It provides a 360-degree view of all interactions, notes, and activity.
Comprehensive Applicant Tracking: Highly customizable candidate profiles, robust search capabilities, and a detailed activity history for every candidate.
Job Order Management: Efficient creation and management of job orders from clients, with tools to quickly match candidates to open roles.
Source-to-Pay Capabilities (Advanced Editions): Bullhorn offers modules that extend beyond recruitment, handling timesheets, expenses, payroll, and invoicing, making it a true end-to-end solution for staffing firms.
Automation & Workflows: Extensive automation tools allow agencies to streamline repetitive tasks, from email outreach to follow-ups, ensuring no lead or candidate falls through the cracks.
VMS/MSP Integrations: Critical for many agencies, Bullhorn integrates seamlessly with Vendor Management Systems (VMS) and Managed Service Provider (MSP) platforms.
Reporting & Analytics: Powerful, customizable reporting focused on agency-specific metrics like placements, fill rates, recruiter performance, revenue generated, and client relationship health.
Marketing & Engagement Tools: Built-in tools for email marketing, mass communication, and candidate engagement campaigns.
Partner Integrations (Marketplace): A vast marketplace of integrations with complementary tools, from background checks to video interviewing, allowing agencies to build a bespoke tech stack.

User Interface (UI) & User Experience (UX):
Bullhorn’s UI is functional and information-dense, reflecting the complex data management needs of staffing agencies. While it has undergone modernizations, it can still feel more utilitarian than the sleeker designs of newer platforms.

For Agency Recruiters: The system provides powerful search capabilities and a wealth of information on every screen. Experienced Bullhorn users appreciate its depth and ability to handle high volumes of data.
For Account Managers: Detailed client and contact records allow for comprehensive relationship management and tracking of sales activities.
Learning Curve: Moderate to High. Due to its extensive feature set and customization options, Bullhorn can have a steeper learning curve, especially for new users or those unfamiliar with agency-specific workflows. However, once mastered, it’s incredibly powerful.

Real-World Scenario:
Imagine a large, multi-branch staffing agency specializing in IT placements. They deal with hundreds of open job orders from various clients, manage a database of tens of thousands of candidates, and need to track everything from initial client contact to final placement, timesheets, and invoicing. Bullhorn is their command center. Their recruiters use its advanced search to quickly pinpoint suitable candidates from their massive database. Account managers leverage the CRM to track client interactions and sales pipelines. The system’s automation ensures that follow-ups with candidates and clients are never missed, and new job orders are immediately distributed to relevant recruiters. Crucially, the back-office integrations allow them to seamlessly transition from candidate placement to payroll and billing, providing an integrated, efficient operation that handles high volume and complex financial transactions.
Now that we’ve covered the individual platforms, let’s move into a comparative analysis across critical dimensions: Integrations, Reporting & Analytics, Pricing, and ultimately, which type of organization each platform is best suited for.
Comparative Analysis: Integrations
The true power of an ATS often lies in its ability to integrate seamlessly with other tools in your HR tech stack. This includes HRIS, payroll, background checks, assessment tools, video interviewing platforms, and more.

Greenhouse: Possesses one of the most extensive and well-developed integration marketplaces. They have an open API and actively partner with a vast array of vendors across all categories (assessments, background checks, HRIS, video interviewing, sourcing tools, etc.). This makes it highly adaptable and scalable for companies with diverse tech needs.
Lever: Also boasts a very strong integration ecosystem, particularly with other HR tech and productivity tools. Its open API allows for custom integrations, and it has built-in connectors for many popular HRIS, assessment, and communication platforms. The focus is on creating a smooth, connected talent acquisition experience.
Workable: Offers a good selection of essential integrations, particularly for core HR functions like background checks, HRIS, and video interviewing. While not as extensive as Greenhouse or Lever, it covers the most common needs for SMBs and mid-market companies. Its focus on simplicity means it often includes “good enough” native functionality that reduces the need for constant external integrations.
Bullhorn: Being a mature platform, Bullhorn has a massive marketplace and a highly customizable API. It integrates with virtually any system relevant to the staffing industry, including VMS/MSP systems, payroll, accounting, compliance tools, and various sourcing platforms. Its integrations are critical for its end-to-end service offering.

Verdict on Integrations: All four platforms offer robust integration capabilities, but the breadth and depth vary. Greenhouse and Bullhorn arguably have the most extensive marketplaces and open APIs, catering to complex enterprise or agency ecosystems. Lever is right behind, excelling in HR tech. Workable provides solid, practical integrations for common needs.
Comparative Analysis: Reporting & Analytics
Data is king in modern recruitment. The ability to track, analyze, and report on key metrics is crucial for optimizing strategies and demonstrating ROI.

Greenhouse: A true leader in reporting and analytics. Greenhouse provides highly detailed, customizable reports on almost every aspect of the hiring process: source effectiveness, time-to-hire, time-to-fill, interview stage bottlenecks, diversity metrics, interviewer performance, and offer acceptance rates. Its structured hiring approach feeds rich data that allows for deep insights and continuous process improvement.
Lever: Offers comprehensive reporting focused on pipeline health, talent pool engagement, source of hire, and recruiter activity. Its CRM capabilities provide unique insights into candidate nurture sequences and the effectiveness of proactive sourcing efforts. Reports are generally intuitive and actionable, helping teams understand where to focus their efforts.
Workable: Provides essential, easy-to-understand reports on key metrics such as pipeline stage, time-to-hire, source effectiveness, and candidate volume. While not as deeply customizable or granular as Greenhouse or Bullhorn, it offers the critical insights most SMBs need to monitor their hiring performance effectively. The focus is on clear, actionable dashboards.
Bullhorn: Boasts extremely powerful and highly customizable reporting, especially tailored for the staffing industry. Agencies can track placements, fill rates, billable hours, recruiter performance, client revenue, gross margin, and much more. It also supports complex dashboards and custom report builders. For agencies, these reports are vital for business intelligence and profitability analysis.

Verdict on Reporting: Greenhouse leads for corporate TA in terms of depth and granularity for structured hiring data. Bullhorn is unparalleled for staffing agency-specific metrics and complex operational reporting. Lever offers excellent insights, especially around proactive talent acquisition. Workable provides accessible and sufficient reporting for growing companies.
Comparative Analysis: Pricing
Pricing models vary significantly and can be a major factor in decision-making. Most ATS platforms operate on a subscription model, often based on the number of active jobs or employee count.

Greenhouse: Generally considered a premium solution. Pricing is typically opaque and enterprise-focused, requiring a custom quote. It’s often based on the number of employees in the organization and features chosen. Best suited for mid-market to enterprise companies with larger budgets.
Lever: Similar to Greenhouse, Lever is a premium offering with custom pricing based on the number of employees. It positions itself as a strategic talent acquisition suite, and its pricing reflects that value. It’s also best suited for mid-market to enterprise companies prioritizing proactive talent acquisition.
Workable: Known for its more transparent and accessible pricing, often structured based on the number of active job openings or employee headcount. It offers various tiers, making it attractive for small businesses to growing mid-market companies. This flexibility and clarity make it a strong contender for those with budget constraints.
Bullhorn: Pricing is highly customized and depends heavily on the specific modules and user licenses required. Given its comprehensive nature and target market (staffing agencies), it’s typically a significant investment. Prices can vary widely based on the size of the agency, the number of users, and whether back-office functions are included.

Verdict on Pricing: Workable offers the most transparent and generally most affordable entry point for smaller businesses. Greenhouse and Lever are premium, enterprise-grade solutions with custom pricing. Bullhorn is a significant investment tailored for the operational needs of staffing agencies.
The Ultimate Question: Which ATS is Right for You?
The “best” ATS isn’t a universal answer; it’s the one that best fits your specific needs, budget, and strategic priorities.
Choose Greenhouse if:

You are a mid-market to enterprise company (especially in tech) focused on structured, data-driven hiring.
You need robust analytics and reporting to continuously optimize your recruitment process and demonstrate ROI.
You prioritize a consistent, fair, and bias-reduced candidate evaluation process with detailed interview kits and scorecards.
Collaboration among hiring managers, recruiters, and executives is critical, and you need tools to streamline feedback and approvals.
You have a healthy budget for a premium, scalable solution and a diverse tech stack that benefits from extensive integrations.

Choose Lever if:

You are a mid-market to enterprise company (especially in tech) that believes in proactive talent acquisition and relationship building.
You need a powerful ATS combined with a full-fledged CRM to nurture passive candidates and build strong talent pipelines.
You want to leverage automated email campaigns and engagement tools to keep candidates warm and engaged over time.
Your hiring teams value a modern, intuitive user interface and a streamlined candidate experience.
You are willing to invest in a premium solution that offers a holistic approach to talent acquisition, from sourcing to hire.

Choose Workable if:

You are a small to medium-sized business (SMB) or a growing company looking for an all-in-one, easy-to-use solution.
You need to quickly get up and running with minimal training and administrative overhead.
Simplicity and intuitive design are paramount for your recruiting team and hiring managers.
You want robust job posting capabilities and a streamlined applicant tracking process without excessive complexity.
You are looking for a cost-effective solution with clear pricing that still delivers essential features and good reporting.

Choose Bullhorn if:

You are a staffing or recruitment agency (from small boutiques to large enterprises).
You need an all-encompassing front and back-office solution to manage clients, candidates, jobs, and potentially payroll/invoicing.
You operate in a high-volume placement environment and require powerful CRM, search, and automation tools.
Your business relies heavily on client relationship management and tracking detailed interactions.
You have a larger budget for a highly specialized, industry-leading platform that can be deeply customized to your agency’s unique workflows.

Conclusion: The Right Tool for the Right Job
The ATS market is rich with innovation, and Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, and Bullhorn each represent the pinnacle of what’s possible in different segments. There’s no single winner in this showdown, only the best fit for your unique circumstances.
Before making your decision, thoroughly assess your current recruitment challenges, your strategic goals, your team’s size and technical proficiency, and your budget. Request demos, involve key stakeholders, and don’t be afraid to ask tough questions about scalability, support, and future roadmaps.
The right ATS isn’t just a purchase; it’s a strategic partnership that will define your ability to attract, engage, and hire the talent that drives your organization forward. Choose wisely, and empower your recruitment team to build the workforce of tomorrow.
Share this post: More

@media (max-width: 1024px){
.TextMedia_text-media-work__dKcBp{
display: flex !important;
flex-direction: column !important;
}

}

.input-container.LocationSearchFilter_location-search__ltYU0{
margin-top: 0px !important;
}

@media (max-width: 1024px) {
.tag-ds.lhh-2025 #navigation .accordion .accordion-header .accordion-icon {
display: block !important;
}
span.material-icons.CountrySelector_lhh-margin-style__8LEXr {
display: none !important;
}
} More

Recruitment teams are no strangers to pressure. With job applications surging, up by 42% year over year, there’s a growing strain on resources, tools, and time. Yet while job seekers are rapidly adopting AI to optimize their resumes and cover letters, many recruiters are still navigating how best to bring AI into their own workflows.
So, where does AI actually make sense for recruiters?
While the hype around Generative AI has been loud, the practical, scalable applications in recruitment are still emerging. The industry has seen a few meaningful wins, largely around speeding up tasks, but we’ve yet to witness widespread AI-led transformation in hiring.
However, that doesn’t mean recruiters should sit idle. In fact, now is the ideal time to prepare, experiment, and upskill. Based on our work at JobAdder, here are five practical ways recruiters can leverage AI now to work smarter and more efficiently.
1. Automate the Admin That Slows You Down
It’s no secret that recruiters spend a significant chunk of time on repetitive, low-impact tasks. Reviewing resumes, extracting skills, formatting candidate profiles, and comparing CVs against job descriptions; these are essential but time-consuming processes.
AI can:

Automatically parse resumes and extract core competencies
Match candidate profiles to job briefs using contextual language models
Summarize experience and highlight potential red flags

These features aren’t about removing the recruiter’s judgment. Instead, they create a faster, cleaner starting point, freeing up time to focus on what matters: candidate engagement, stakeholder communication, and strategic hiring conversations.
2. Improve Job Ad Quality and Clarity
Writing compelling job ads isn’t just about grammar and keywords. It’s about clear communication, inclusive language, and an accurate reflection of what’s actually needed for success in the role.
AI tools can assist by:

Generating first drafts based on role descriptions or templates
Flagging jargon or biased phrasing
Suggesting clearer alternatives based on proven best practices

While these tools shouldn’t replace human editing, they’re valuable for reducing friction in the writing process and ensuring consistency across teams. The result? A better candidate fit and fewer applications from those who are unclear about the role.
3. Focus on Integration, Not Just Innovation
A key reason AI hasn’t been widely adopted in recruitment is simple: it’s clunky to use.
When AI tools sit outside the core recruitment platform, they create extra steps, exporting data, re-entering information, and switching between interfaces. This creates friction and, ultimately, abandonment.
What works better is embedded AI features that show up within the existing workflow:

In-line resume parsing during shortlisting
Candidate insights that surface in CRM profiles
AI-generated summaries built directly into candidate cards

Until full integration becomes the norm, recruiters can still reduce friction by building workflows with clear prompts and templates that minimize toggling between tools.
4. Train Your Team to Speak AI
Adopting AI tools isn’t just a tech upgrade, it’s a skill shift. Teams need to understand how to prompt AI tools effectively, where to trust them, and how to catch the inevitable errors or hallucinations.
At JobAdder, we’ve found that formal training, from engineering teams to recruiters, is essential. Even non-technical team members benefit from exposure to:

Prompt engineering basics
Data privacy implications
Realistic expectations of GenAI capabilities

Recruitment leaders should consider internal “AI champions” or training programs that encourage exploration and experimentation across teams. The better your recruiters understand the tool, the more confident (and efficient) they become.
5. Start with the Problem, Not the Tool
AI has a lot of potential, but not every challenge needs it.
Before rolling out another new platform or chatbot, it’s worth asking: what’s the actual problem we’re solving?
For example:

Are you struggling to prioritize candidates fast enough?
Is your team overwhelmed by scheduling?
Are hiring managers asking for more market intelligence?

Once the pain point is clear, AI can be tested in a focused way, rather than bolted on with vague hopes of efficiency. Recruiters who start small, measure the impact, and iterate will get the most from AI, now and in the long run.
What’s Next for AI in Recruitment?
While the tech industry loves to talk about revolutions, AI’s impact in recruitment may look more like evolution. The gains will be real, but incremental.
Think faster, cleaner and more structured. Not yet a total reimagining of hiring, but a definite shift in how recruiters spend their time.
At JobAdder, we’re doubling down on areas where AI can already add value: working with unstructured data like resumes and job ads, summarizing large volumes of information, and eliminating time-heavy bottlenecks in workflows.
Recruiters who embrace this wave early, not with hype, but with curiosity, will be best positioned to thrive as the technology continues to evolve.
By Joel Delmaire, Chief Product Officer at JobAdder, an end-to-end recruitment platform empowering HR and talent acquisition professionals to simplify and streamline their workflows. He leads product innovation across AI, automation and user experience.
Share this post: More

The hunt for top creative specialists is fierce. The market is overflowing, demands are constantly shifting, and truly unique skill sets are rare. But don’t worry! This guide offers recruiters actionable strategies to attract and retain exceptional creative talent.
Think Beyond the Traditional
Sometimes, the best hires come from unexpected places. Instead of fixating on rigid criteria like years of experience or formal education, prioritize passion, potential, and cultural fit.

Embrace unconventional backgrounds: A D&D Dungeon Master might possess the imaginative thinking and leadership skills needed to excel as a game designer.
Look beyond the resume: Give candidates opportunities to showcase their unique qualities through diverse interview stages and assessments.

Essential Skills for Creative Specialists
In the dynamic world of game development, creative specialists need a blend of specialized knowledge, core game design principles, and essential soft skills.

Adaptability: The ability to embrace new technologies and trends is crucial in the ever-evolving GameDev landscape.
Out-of-the-box thinking: Generating innovative ideas within technical limitations and genre constraints is a must.
Teamwork: Collaborative spirit and effective communication are vital for bringing creative visions to life.
Hard skills: A deep understanding of game mechanics, trends, and player psychology is essential, along with the ability to apply and reimagine popular mechanics (like the A4 mechanic) in engaging ways.

Prioritize Culture Fit and Soft Skills
Technical prowess is important, but it’s only one piece of the puzzle.

Cultural alignment: Observe how candidates interact with potential colleagues to assess their compatibility with your team’s values and working style.
Strong communication: Seek individuals who can effectively share, pitch, and negotiate ideas.
Adaptability and collaboration: Prioritize candidates who are receptive to feedback, embrace constructive criticism, and foster collaboration.
Empathy and emotional intelligence: Understanding player motivations and emotions is key to crafting compelling game experiences.

Experience Trumps Education
In GameDev, a strong portfolio often outweighs a formal degree.

Real-world evidence: Prioritize candidates with a portfolio demonstrating practical skills and experience through personal projects, indie games, or concept art.
Relevant experience: When faced with a choice, favor candidates whose experience aligns with your project’s specific needs and style.

Evaluating Creativity: A Multi-faceted Approach
Go beyond traditional interviews to assess a candidate’s creative potential.

Test assignments: Gauge their ability to adapt to new challenges and problem-solve.
Brainstorming sessions: Observe their ideation process, collaboration skills, and ability to bring ideas to life.
Real-life case studies: Evaluate their problem-solving approach and creative thinking in practical scenarios.
Portfolio reviews: Assess the diversity, originality, and depth of their work.

Unconventional Hiring Strategies
Think outside the box when hiring creative specialists.

Indie game festivals and hackathons: Connect with passionate junior developers and observe their teamwork and problem-solving skills under pressure.
Workshops and lectures: Engage with aspiring professionals seeking opportunities in established studios.
Social media: Follow industry experts and engage with potential candidates sharing their knowledge and projects on platforms like LinkedIn, Telegram, and Medium.

Key Takeaways for Recruiters

Focus on potential: Go beyond resumes and standardized evaluations to uncover hidden talents and assess a candidate’s true potential.
Build a strong employer brand: Cultivate a reputation for creativity and innovation by actively participating in industry events and sharing your company’s success stories.
Invest in development: Attract and retain top talent by offering opportunities for growth through mentorship programs and training initiatives.

By embracing these strategies, recruiters can navigate the competitive landscape of GameDev and secure the creative talent needed to build exceptional games.
Inessa Baianova is a recruiter at Nexters with over four years of experience in HR, specializing in IT and game development. She leads teams, builds processes from scratch, and mentors young professionals.
Share this post: More